we want to live the knowledge too live the content
there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
Above and in front two birds are darting in and out of a tree. Sometimes they collide to fight or maybe mate, but I can't really make it out in the low light. It's just after
dusk
, I have nothing to do, I'm watching them, trying to figure it out.something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
so at the end
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.not their contents
Tue, 02 Dec 2025 11:29:50
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
we can only engage in such a way
yes
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate