there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
magnetisation/form
abrar?
i really havent
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
i was tempted to lie about my name
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
like first name
bro i read nothing in my life
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
was it worth it
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
brb i will read and reply sincerely
December 2025
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
so at the end
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
thank you
you have a beautiful account btw
is everyoneback on tumblr now