i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

thank you

yeah

sorry i am texting like a slav

plato

whats your name?

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

fw

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

what do you think my name is

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

plato

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

god being the centre magnet

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

yeah

its good short few pages

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

much more tactility

barren land

propensity within someone

your feed looks like my tumblr

or never left

i have read not even 1 book

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

no like which do people call me

its performative

we can only engage in such a way

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

we want to live the knowledge too live the content