think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

much more tactility

idk

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

so at the end

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

propensity within someone

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

is this you as well

no i haven't really read anything

whats your name?

its good

Picture

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

it is hopeful

its good

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

its performative