i dont understand magnetisation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

autonomy of learning

which magnetises chains of pins

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

like magnets

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

abrar?

like first name

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

idk

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

fw

wow, you are the first stranger to write a textwall to me

Sun, 02 Nov 2025 21:54:03

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models