okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
that looks like my instagram account
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
so at the end
barren land
idk
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
so the method has to be autonomous
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
its performative
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
what do you mean
its good
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
god being the centre magnet
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
propensity within someone
was it worth it
no i haven't really read anything
like first name
what do you think my name is
Sun, 02 Nov 2025 23:49:08
thank you