you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

propensity within someone

as in

you cannot feed someone truth

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

we can only engage in such a way

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

autonomy of learning

so the method has to be autonomous

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

not so on: yvf(wthw)

much more tactility

The slug lives in my bathroom. I only see it in the early hours of the morning, when I'm not quite right.

the site i am dreaming

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

magnetises a pin

and the fake qualifier

i love it here

so at the end

god being the centre magnet

which magnetises chains of pins