mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
or never left
magnetisation/form
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
you cannot feed someone truth
i dont understand magnetisation
isaac
i understand
which magnetises chains of pins
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
its good short few pages
its good
its performative
propensity within someone
hello reader,
it is hopeful
magnetises a pin
was it worth it
wait what is that
not so on: yvf(wthw)
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59
no longer writing in the third person
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
Windrush Art Kid Oligarch
currently
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it