have you read
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
its performative
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
as in
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
bro i read nothing in my life
i understand
we can only engage in such a way
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
so the method has to be autonomous
thank you
abrar?
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
its good short few pages
like first name
...
isaac
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
idk
...
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you