amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

isaac newton

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

propensity within someone

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

that looks like my instagram account

so the method has to be autonomous

idk

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

all that is to say

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

feel you

much more tactility

i love it here

or never left


like first name

yeah

i want to do that too

bro i read nothing in my life

and the fake qualifier

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

was it worth it

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

plato