I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
not their contents
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
magnetisation/form
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
that looks like my instagram account
much more tactility
you cannot feed someone truth
propensity within someone
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
...
all that is to say
...
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
i dont understand magnetisation
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
no longer writing in the third person
so at the end