its good

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

propensity within someone

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

much more tactility

so an active mazelike process

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

all that is to say

so the method has to be autonomous

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

magnetises a pin

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

so at the end

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

no i haven't really read anything

its performative

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

plato

no like which do people call me

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

magnetisation/form

and the fake qualifier

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt