there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

lol yea

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

like first name

ion

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

abrar?

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

FOUNDING DOCUMENT


it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful


whats your name?

idk

its good

what do you mean

we need to be deconstructing our identities

that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf


but i respect your search