i love it here

no i haven't really read anything

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

propensity within someone

ion

division of reality is straying away from it

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

not their contents

no like which do people call me

so at the end

much more tactility

plato

ahnaf abrar

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

thank you

i really havent

its good

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

as in

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

you cannot feed someone truth

have you read

yeah

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

what do you think my name is

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

fw

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

which magnetises chains of pins

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak