like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

what do you think my name is

no i haven't really read anything

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

its good

idk

is this you as well

i want to do that too

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

like first name

whats your name?

send your tumblr

i understand

have you read

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

so the method has to be autonomous

that looks like my instagram account

god being the centre magnet

its good

magnetisation/form

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

i really havent

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

sorry i am texting like a slav

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

much more tactility

you cannot feed someone truth

so an active mazelike process

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

barren land